August 10, 2009
We’ve been asked about a criminal charge against an adultery under Korean criminal law quite often. Foreign employees in Korean should be cautious that such an adultery is a crime under Korean law. Here is a real example of such a case where a foreign officer committed a adultery and the company(employer)’s legal concern made it ask some legal consultations to our law firm regarding the adultery law and criminal law process in Korea.
Q) Mr. XX, who is a head director of our company, committed an adultery and was charged by the Korean prosecutor. He has confessed his guilty and the prosecutor demanded one year’s imprisonment for his crime to the court. If the court finalize that Mr. XX is guilty, is that means that Mr. XX will be imprisonment for one year or lesser?
A) Finding guilty does not always mean Mr. XX will be imprisoned. The Court may SUSPEND the imprisonment for certain years even though Mr. XX is guilty. The Korean Criminal Act provides that a married person who commits adultery shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than two years. However, the Act also provides the execution of the sentence for an adultery can be Read the rest of this entry »
Leave a Comment » |
Business in Korea, Corporate, Criminal Case, Entire Entries, Korean Lawyer, Law Firms | Tagged: Korean Adultery Law, Korean Criminal Lawyer, Korean Law Firm, Korean Lawyer |
Permalink
Posted by chungwi
July 18, 2009
Recently, Mr. Wonil Chung, a partner at Chung & Partners, has successfully represented NHS, Inc., an internationally-renowned U.S. company which sells skateboards, apparels under various trademarked brand worldwide, in policing their trademark in South Korea. NHS, Inc. and its Korean distributor had found that counterfeits of SantaCruz, one of the NHS, Inc.’s premium brand, had been made and sold in numerous online shopping mall sites in Korea. They requested Mr. Wonil Chung to stop them from selling the counterfeits. Mr. Wonil Chung sent cease and desists letters to the online shopping sites which sold the counterfeits, notifying Read the rest of this entry »
Leave a Comment » |
Business in Korea, Entertainment Business, Entire Entries, Intellectual Property, Korean Lawyer, Law Firms | Tagged: IP lawyer, Korean IP Lawyer, trademark lawyer in Korea |
Permalink
Posted by chungwi
March 28, 2009
We’ve been asked about this issue from U.S. lawyers or U.S. law school students quite often. As reported earlier this month, the Foreign Legal Consultant Act was approved by the National Assembly. The Act allows law firms from the United States and countries which have free trade agreements with Korea to set up local branches to provide legal consulting services.
However, in order to qualify as local consultants, foreign firms will not be allowed to hire locally qualified lawyers. Foreign lawyers cannot be self-employed consultants, Read the rest of this entry »
Leave a Comment » |
Entire Entries, Korean Lawyer, Law Firms | Tagged: Korean Law Firm, Korean Lawyer, Korean Legal Market |
Permalink
Posted by chungwi
March 19, 2009
Recently there can be seen so many lawsuits are being filed against domestic banks with regard to the bank’s irresponsible fund sale. The Korean fund buyers are alleging the losses in the funds which are still on-going were caused by the fund-sellers’ not informing sufficient information on the risk and possibilities of losses when they put the money to the funds.
As a matter of law, Korean court has ruled that the banks are obliged to inform the customer of the structure of the investment such as fund or option transaction and the risk of possible losses sufficiently when they solicit the customers for investments. If they neglect that obligation, it constitutes a breach of contract and Read the rest of this entry »
Leave a Comment » |
Banking & Financing, Business in Korea, Civil Case, Corporate, Entire Entries, Korean Lawyer, Law Firms, Legal News, Litigation, Securities | Tagged: Fund Law Suit, Irresponsible Sale, Korea Fund Law, Korea Investment Lawsuit |
Permalink
Posted by chungwi
December 20, 2008
Last September, Supreme Porsecutors Office(SPO) investigated the ex-head of Military Mutual Aid Association(MMAA) and his son as they had received 30,000 stocks of Kenertec, a Korean Energy company, from its representative in response to securing investments from the MMAA.
Mr. Wonil Chung, a partner of Chung & Partners, represented the son and succeeded in making the SPO drop the charge and not prosecuting him.
Afterward, the SPO prosecuted only the ex-head of MMAA to the court, but last Friday, Seoul Central District Court sentenced not guilty stating there is no evidence that supports there had happened any illegal activities.
Under Korean Criminal Law, a person who, administering other’s business, receives property or obtains advantage from a 3rd party in response to an illegal solicitation Read the rest of this entry »
Leave a Comment » |
Criminal Case, Entire Entries, Korean Lawyer, Law Firms, Legal News, Litigation | Tagged: Korean Criminal Law Firm, Korean Criminal Lawyer |
Permalink
Posted by chungwi
February 25, 2008
In January 31, the Seoul Central District Court ordered the Samsung Group to repay more than 2.33 trillion won ($2.46 billion) to the 14 creditors of its defunct Samsung Motors, which was the country’s biggest-ever financial civil lawsuit. Samsung Group said yesterday that it will appeal that court ruling.
Samsung Motors applied for a court-administered debt restructuring program in June 1999, and Chairman Lee Kun Hee announced his plan to inject private money. Two months later, Samsung signed a deal with the creditors to cover a 2.45 trillion won debt by the end of 2000. Under the agreement, Lee handed over his 3.5 million shares of the unlisted Samsung Life Insurance Co. to the creditors and promised to list the company. However the insurance firm never went public, and creditors were unable to convert all their share to cash due to the large volume. Creditors filed a lawsuit in December 2005, claiming 5 trillion won including penalties.
One of the biggest issues on this trial was the validity of the agreement between Samsung Group and the creditors. Samsung Group alleged that the agreement is void because it was entered under duress. However the court rejected it.
As I’m a lawyer, it was very interesting who would represent Samsung Group and the creditors. There Read the rest of this entry »
Leave a Comment » |
Business in Korea, Civil Case, Corporate, Entire Entries, Law Firms, Legal News, Litigation | Tagged: Korea Law Firm, Korean Law Firm, Korean Litigation Lawyer, Samusung lawsuit |
Permalink
Posted by chungwi